From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  2 19:51:11 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E86106564A;
	Thu,  2 Feb 2012 19:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0FC8FC0C;
	Thu,  2 Feb 2012 19:51:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbdq11 with SMTP id dq11so3122426wgb.31
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:51:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=OVP83S0OyVh6itxiLlLB0r28OVKY8SuYYiD5KyvBXts=;
	b=uBmw40U1VPVNpL6ruE8hO1T0b3PC0iWEdH1MUTmnTfneKmpqhm1Vks5R7kKqRIOtMv
	R0FYs9XYe/O8jQ5kbmyrmuW+xokHgrre5SfyQRX11awiJo8NkPOHeZ2rAqY6sA0+FsVU
	KCPVEHUp6s31rNbGb6PO7SMmZIOHj94XLdNc8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.78.168 with SMTP id c8mr6794492wix.19.1328212270077; Thu,
	02 Feb 2012 11:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.106.129 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:51:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F2ADF5C.1030900@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4F29A464.3080302@zonov.org> <4F29E2C8.5000909@FreeBSD.org>
	<4F2A2EAB.3010700@zonov.org> <1446971288.20120202105912@yandex.ru>
	<4F2AB0A9.70905@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAFMmRNznRgTU6sN+Kmo4jg0AEMfWiQzzNt4LvMFpR9qTvGiqYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F2ADF5C.1030900@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:51:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFMmRNxc2_GWum_jPsghNgp9dfVRAHEKjtpzEdvUOOEMOJa31g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
	=?KOI8-R?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru>,
	Andrey Zonov <andrey@zonov.org>
Subject: Re: netisr defered - active only one thread
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:51:11 -0000

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov
<melifaro@freebsd.org> wrote:
> As far as I understand, the only effect of setting bindthreads to 1 causes
> intr_event_bind() to bind soft netisr to appropriate CPU. Can you point me
> to ML discussion or some other info clarifying this bug?

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-January/037597.html

The intended behaviour is as you describe, unfortunately subsequent
threads that are spawned in the intr process inherit the CPU affinity
of the last netisr through to be bound to a CPU.