From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 08:10:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E0837B401 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from dsl093-019-250.msp1.dsl.speakeasy.net (dsl093-019-250.msp1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.19.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3A4A43FAF for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:10:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@jocose.org) Received: (qmail 54409 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 16:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jocose.org) (10.0.0.198) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2003 16:10:43 -0000 Message-ID: <3E8B0B9D.6010300@jocose.org> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:11:09 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Lambert References: <3E8AED1B.10606@jocose.org> <3E8AEFBF.D1D640E3@mindspring.com> <3E8AFB2F.3040701@jocose.org> <3E8B01F2.B3E02FC8@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <3E8B01F2.B3E02FC8@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 16:10:44 -0000 Terry Lambert wrote: > If you look over the historical cases of this discussion, > you'll see that the answer always comes down to "make the > system more modular, so people can replace XXX with YYY and > quit bothering us; please send patches". 8-) 8-). > Thanks for your help on this. I've been getting so many search results that I've been unable to determine the exact problem myself. So, one absolute requirement is that the system have both an mta, and an msa. When you say msa, does this include pop&imap capabilities? Pete...