From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 17:22:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DEE16A420; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3472D43DA7; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:22:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id jBFHM0bO005638; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:22:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:22:00 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: David Xu In-Reply-To: <200512151010.jBFAA6MZ039962@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/90392: libc stdio memory leak with pthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:22:22 -0000 On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, David Xu wrote: > The following reply was made to PR threads/90392; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: David Xu > To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, dhartmei@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: threads/90392: libc stdio memory leak with pthread > Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:04:02 +0800 > > It does not deadlock, as I found the FILELOCK is a recursive lock. ;-) Still, we shouldn't use recursive locks in our implementation of libc. There really is no need to. If you can fix it, please do so :-) -- DE