Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:13:39 -0500 From: Gerard <gerard@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade changed operation? Message-ID: <20080222121339.1816328e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <200802221701.m1MH1gjU031497@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> References: <200802221701.m1MH1gjU031497@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/UPs.Tln1bHqCJHA6fmsxhnE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:01:42 -0500 (EST) "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> wrote: > ---> Skipping 'www/apache13' because a requisite port 'lang/perl5.8' > failed (specify -k to force) =20 >=20 > But I *DO* want apache upgraded, even if I have perl5.8 in > HOLD_PKG. >=20 > It is behaving properly? I believe it is. I am not quite sure why you have Perl on hold, however, why not do as the message indicated and use the '-k' switch. Personally, I would remove Perl, as well as Ruby from hold, but that is just me. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net There are few people more often in the wrong than those who cannot endure to be thought so. --Sig_/UPs.Tln1bHqCJHA6fmsxhnE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAke/AsMACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMkCGACfeRHWa4Zd1vqnj20o00yg27Nf 4e0AoKIRppXfU/Ff3VnOuvAjBUPERsVt =3HZJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UPs.Tln1bHqCJHA6fmsxhnE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080222121339.1816328e>