From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 10:50:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B6BB133C8; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EB01779; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1asTEL-0002Cz-9y; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:50:05 +0300 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:50:05 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Lars Engels , dan_partelly , Julian Elischer , Alfred Perlstein , lev@FreeBSD.org, Glen Barber , Nathan Whitehorn , Sean Fagan , freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160419105005.GG4841@zxy.spb.ru> References: <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org> <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <571533B8.6090109@freebsd.org> <20160418194010.GX1554@FreeBSD.org> <57153E80.4080800@FreeBSD.org> <571551AB.4070203@freebsd.org> <5715E1E9.8060507@freebsd.org> <4787f50d3f160e606ad55737e93a324a@rdsor.ro> <20160419102751.GM82927@e-new.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160419102751.GM82927@e-new.0x20.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:36:11 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 10:50:07 -0000 On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:27:51PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:18:00PM +0300, dan_partelly wrote: > > > > be as terse as possible. You guys seen the "Add remove programs" > > in Windows control panel ? Thats sane. Even now the default output > > of pkg borders insane, when you have many packages installed. 99% of my > > time > > I dont really care about lib-rtyum546.78.9. I care only less than 1% of my > > time when something > > goes wrong. > > Don't use "pkg info" then. Use "pkg leaf": > > % pkg info | wc -l > 249 > % pkg leaf | wc -l > 25 > > "leaf" is an alias for: > pkg 'query -e "%a == 0" "%n-%v"' slw@pkg-test:~ % pkg leaf | wc -l 1 slw@pkg-test:~ % pkg leaf pkg-1.7.2 slw@pkg-test:~ % pkg info | wc -l 756 > And to everyone complaining about the number of packages: How many of > you have actually used the packaged base? Wrong question: I am already complain about Xorg spliting. Some servers managed by me have 53 packages, included 29 as p5-libwww.