From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 22:33:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BB616A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:33:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from user123.c2.studioproteus.si (user123.c2.studioproteus.si [213.253.97.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84E143D2F for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mte@bomango.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (BSN-95-249-115.dsl.siol.net [193.95.249.115]) iBMMYHXV029863 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:34:18 +0100 Message-ID: <41C9F649.8020906@bomango.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:33:45 +0100 From: Matej User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041220) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org References: <41C07641.4080800@bomango.info> <20041215174609.GB24622@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20041215174609.GB24622@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: envy24 X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:33:52 -0000 Brooks Davis wrote: >On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 06:37:05PM +0100, Matej wrote: > > >>Thanks Michael very much, >>I quite got it - but I this has opened a few questions more to me: Without >>setting/installing >>that OSS, (using some ICH driver for the nforce2 onboard audio card, only >>adding snd_ich_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf), I get some "OSS driver" >>displayed in XMMS settings. What oss is this? >>And another one - should I download the oss package from the >>http://www.4front-tech.com/ or is there any port/pkg in freebsd? I was >>looking but couldn't find it. >> >> > >The FreeBSD sound system uses the OSS API (though a somewhat older >version that that from 4front). Please don't make the mistake of >assuming that just because Linux failed to implement something well >it is always bad. > >-- Brooks > > > Thanks for the explanation