Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:      intech <sdenic@intech.co.rs>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HAST initial sync speed
Message-ID:  <1371123581091-5819759.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C6BDBB9.3020007@gibfest.dk>
References:  <4C61CF4D.4060009@gibfest.dk> <4C651B7E.5000805@gibfest.dk> <4C6B08BD.9080206@gibfest.dk> <20100818110655.GA2177@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C6BC0BA.9030303@gibfest.dk> <4C6BC35B.9040000@gibfest.dk> <20100818121133.GC2177@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C6BD521.1060807@gibfest.dk> <20100818125856.GE2177@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C6BDBB9.3020007@gibfest.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thought this threat is almost 3 years old, I want to ask if this
MAX_SEND_SIZE adopted in freebsd 8.3 and even fbsd9.1?
Indeed I have the same issue on 1Gb network - nodes performing sync at only
10MBytes/sec ?! and I can't figure out what is happening as network itself
is not the problem, I tested it.
And just one question fullsync is only option for HAST replication at time
of writing, so could HAST perform at 100MB/sec in this mode, and  when we
expect memsync and async to be released?



--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/HAST-initial-sync-speed-tp4027033p5819759.html
Sent from the freebsd-fs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1371123581091-5819759.post>