From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 20 09:56:18 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id JAA29159 for current-outgoing; Mon, 20 Feb 1995 09:56:18 -0800
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA29153 for <current@freefall.cdrom.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 1995 09:56:13 -0800
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA06118; Mon, 20 Feb 1995 10:59:44 -0700
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 1995 10:59:44 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199502201759.KAA06118@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su>
       "Re: libcompat and shlib conflict" (Feb 20,  2:02pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su>,
        current@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: libcompat and shlib conflict
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ Two modules defining regerror ]

> Only one of those modules normally picked, not both. So, conflict
> never happens. It is error in newest ld.

Umm, which modules gets picked?  What if I want one module, and not the
other?  There *is* a conflict in that two modules in the same library
are defining the same function.


Nate