Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:37:47 +0200 From: Elias Chrysocheris <elias_chr@otenet.gr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap Message-ID: <201211140837.47845.elias_chr@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <CADEyrJr5XY2X0Rzqi8S_8U8jSgFfZnT5Wc4qeXcPXCJVdTL0Ow@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211121726.58712.lumiwa@gmail.com> <201211121813.20966.lumiwa@gmail.com> <CADEyrJr5XY2X0Rzqi8S_8U8jSgFfZnT5Wc4qeXcPXCJVdTL0Ow@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeap. Same here: pluto# portsnap fetch update Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. No updates needed. Ports tree is already up to date. How can it be possible? 3 years now that I use FreeBSD there was not even a single day that we didn't have updates in the ports tree. How can it be possible for two consecutive days to have "No updates needed."? Something is wrong... Regards Elias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201211140837.47845.elias_chr>