Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:53:19 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Dan Kogai <dankogai@dan.co.jp> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Vadim Konovalov <vkonovalov@peterstar.ru>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, perl5-porters@perl.org Subject: Re: Save a few hunderd kilobytes or a few hundred perl users? Message-ID: <20020501105319.D70018@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <F59D1F9E-5D1E-11D6-BB19-00039301D480@dan.co.jp>; from dankogai@dan.co.jp on Thu, May 02, 2002 at 01:17:40AM %2B0900 References: <200205011556.g41FucoI039924@grimreaper.grondar.org> <F59D1F9E-5D1E-11D6-BB19-00039301D480@dan.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 01:17:40AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote: > Speaking of which, the whole build process does not use objective-C > (correct me if I am wrong). The cost of Objective-C, given we have to have C, is 1 minute in build time, and 390K of diskspace (installed). This is several orders of manitude below Perl 5.6.x. > So if you insist on stripping Perl it may > as well be unfair to leave GCC unstripped (I pretty much doubt GPL > allows you to do so, however). Why in the world do you think the GPL prevents that? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020501105319.D70018>