From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 17:30:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E20060B for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C194C8FC12 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c1so9842877lah.9 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:30:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=02cyQ3xyNySjyq+TwtLeS213h8zHivGDuYHgxXX7uvE=; b=aOdqavis0ztVIWVdC/HfiPmH/Wl5fWHR5fuv7aTP4m208nVU80YAPtCY9gzbC7s4J2 6qn+aXKGf1R/wLMyfMRjFyH3CG8Wgb3pywInwTKlFXr0pnGDolNaNE71NTuNvYDrSV/y 0tMvz+kic9MVnz9DEzVz7YWRyVwmeBS1Cqo6+R6zqALIG963Ckiswlfyyak0MXiZ2y1g w/FY14efG/1XUhJS6fqkttLO1m6bxr8z3QsmXhLLb3tXPO5tDETX+CTSb8PDgD9wOIzC 1NXpV92vJa1Oh7Wew4AR27spqKjoVO+a3qF1plWSd2liDjqsN2RYYOLgyouqfve1HOA3 fn8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.14.46 with SMTP id m14mr9997174lbc.98.1356456645261; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:30:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.11.165 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:30:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs> References: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:30:45 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6Y66OUHmFnFlpX5fMr4eNsZFp14 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements From: CeDeROM To: Zoran Kolic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:30:47 -0000 I always considered FreeBSD to be the most unabiguous, straightforward and sometimes even raw, but still extremely powerful and innovative, operating system out there. Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me... I have fallback into RC3 and I think the RELEASE files should be removed as well because there was no RELEASE yet. There is no rush to get RELEASE, I am sure it is better to get RC4, RC5, RC6 and then a RELEASE "when its ready". When people get buggy and unstable RELEASE and install it on a production systems they will neither come back to the system nor even support it in future :-( -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info