From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Oct  6 14:20: 4 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7781B14C84
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 Oct 1999 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA54351;
	Wed, 6 Oct 1999 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199910062120.OAA54351@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>
Subject: Re: bin/13383 sys/netinet/in.h violates C++ spec. 
Reply-To: Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/13383; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/13383 sys/netinet/in.h violates C++ spec. 
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 01:19:32 +0400

 OpenBSD fixed <netinet/in.h> and their commit log says the fix follow
 OSF/1. IMO we should follow them.
 
 Dima
 
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message