From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 8 13:38:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA5D2F0 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 13:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116FF1651 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 13:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r58Dc9aN083253; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 07:38:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r58Dc9vD083250; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 07:38:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 07:38:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: ZFS and Glabel In-Reply-To: <20130608095744.GA4643@icarus.home.lan> Message-ID: References: <20130608095744.GA4643@icarus.home.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 08 Jun 2013 07:38:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, "Reed A. Cartwright" X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:38:11 -0000 On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 02:24:46AM -0700, Reed A. Cartwright wrote: >> I currently have a raidz2 pool that uses whole disks: da6, da7, etc. >> I want to label these using glabel and have zfs mount them using the >> labels. This way, if an HDD fails, I will be able to easily replace >> the drive. > > Can I ask what you mean when you say "that way if a HDD fails I'll be > able to easily replace the drive?" > > What about using labels makes the process of disk replacement "easier"? In general, the nice thing about labels is that they give a particular drive a static name. That name does not depend on the controller hardware or method of connection, it's not calculated in any way, so it remains the same. Most other ID methods are calculated in some way, and can/may change.