From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 8 05:47:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F05F878 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 05:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm25-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm25-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B92C1468 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 05:47:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1431064067; bh=GnuYGblxfbiuEOSep/KoxMsoEpg9+Z99oYJEcgIwZ90=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject; b=KN3XY50lcRekjdfp7lrcetNX8Sqe3W5dFOUZviQiJJOYTJupKzXJ8+flrhppRmm578YAPAaAdqFHo+UI6Vodl3O4nLuH2HZeVpvwpRX12vehqMBQSXx0kZTBBrj1xLWqwkKXsKKMQHwUI/vV7C6Qb+gRvioNUl1ON9iHne0fDEjYRXfFhfzk9EUO34/KnKpUGNX9KJF/GGNcYUtcl38dVGmaGNFA3yQJI3B8oPc4Joyn9i6MR0cPiV5y8t0Q/2UZC1k3wbwtfbwcdqYSIW85j4HLJT9zBsCiin1NEFrDyK2sNS2RKZ14pE3Fuw+c8G0+4+Ije5MBIe1athSl6cUeew== Received: from [66.196.81.172] by nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 May 2015 05:47:47 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.10] by tm18.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 May 2015 05:47:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp110.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 May 2015 05:47:47 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 74705.92184.bm@smtp110.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: GlNzePkVM1lQvwjcEA.AXKQvQ8kcNehGnzkO1XtGQ49HlAU 9agdfeUws0cTUnbr6le1_bAfkTFaG1iigNc0IPbXwduEtH.0CT4aqzhatMxg yG7Yh7UhWX6g_.mmiNE740CRMMq.SVPVZu9jv0aE6nsmOj2SqWyxFlIHkNUj GS.DSx.Z8UDYJ8xkCP3GwOXTtpO0s6zG34C57KRgDz0cwVSlb9fzA8T77Nmy buyfV2vPAXaY7obNwMs0sRii_S9jFiovt39coP8myO9qMpqwxxVRLqslNbAE RRHRdqja1RNGZjbSq2tcxvcJoDrBFTT_G_od.t8n8wUspGOBBxf2B58ZBau9 OCS0NpF0o7LAGnNCfoTXonmHtFRwmytxA0aP0rz_SqVqFabMVgsj.QG55tEV 2vPFfKtz9tnZCkfQBc9fU0zX4LlZhLXZdLsHkv_AqhVMd3qCQ9pKPAJ_2j0_ gfZ0cIbbUzYu5i6s9FV4HLkp1GNV0UIntDPIvZVvCctYDs4ZKsg6qswc9ocN b58vcCHBriv34COHbs9lB2ydk88xV58lz X-Yahoo-SMTP: xcjD0guswBAZaPPIbxpWwLcp9Unf Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS From: Pedro Giffuni In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 00:47:43 -0500 Cc: NGie Cooper , FreeBSD Current list , Lyndon Nerenberg Message-Id: <46E9A948-9D19-4ED6-AB4E-03CFDD5B92A0@FreeBSD.org> References: To: Doug Brewer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 05:47:54 -0000 > Il giorno 08/mag/2015, alle ore 00:26, Doug Brewer = ha scritto: >=20 > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:18:38PM -0700, NGie Cooper wrote:=20 > >=20 > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Pedro Giffuni > wrote:=20 > > > Hello;=20 > > >=20 > > > On 05/07/15 14:56, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:=20 > > >>=20 > > >> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Pedro Giffuni wrote:=20 > > >>=20 > > >>> Unfortunately I don't use RCS enough (it looks like I should = though) so=20 > > >>> I am not in a good position to take the next step and deal with = any=20 > > >>> fallout it may produce.=20 > > >>=20 > > >>=20 > > >> If we can have a build-knob to disable GNU RCS and enable the new = one I=20 > > >> will happily twist up the new version and hammer on it.=20 > > >>=20 > > >=20 > > > Yes, that's usually the next step in the process. It is a little = bit messy=20 > > > because=20 > > > there is a WITHOUT_RCS option and openrcs doesn't have rcsfreeze = (and=20 > > > perhaps something else that we don't use).=20 > > > > > > I really want to check out first if there is some strong opinion = against=20 > > > OpenRCS. Perhaps someone that has used it before and thinks it is = a=20 > > > bad idea.=20 > > >=20 > > > It looks like there are voices against it, so those have to be = addressed=20 > > > first.=20 > >=20 > > Setting WITHOUT_RCS also breaks etcupdate (the tool requires rcs=20 > > bits); check with jhb first to make sure that OpenRCS works with=20 > > etcupdate.=20 >=20 > Confirmed. Pedro, are you also willing to fix fallout as Xin Li = pointed out?=20 > If not, please revert, thanks. I haven=E2=80=99t committed anything to base so there=E2=80=99s nothing = to revert (?). Pedro. >=20