From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Mar 28 23:30:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E7737B422 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2T7U7O33258; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:30:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:30:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203290730.g2T7U7O33258@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Subject: Re: docs/36461: [PATCH] dd(1) Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/36461; it has been noted by GNATS. From: To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/36461: [PATCH] dd(1) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:27:41 -0800 (PST) Gary, this may be ``illegal'' mdoc, but could you tell me what you think about the following changes? I have removed the old values and changed added new ones according to the pr report. Little doubt is in my mind that you or ru, or Giorgos will say ``Hey Tom, there IS a backspace macro or something... Oh well, the output looked ok when I did an nroff -man dd.1 on my machine... -- Tom Rhodes --- dd.1.old Fri Mar 29 02:11:03 2002 +++ dd.1 Fri Mar 29 02:22:47 2002 @@ -151,8 +151,7 @@ For all other devices, the correct number of blocks is read without distinguishing between a partial or complete block being read. .It Xo -.Cm conv= -.Ns Cm value Ns Op \&, Cm value \&... +.Cm conv=value[,value,...] .Xc Where .Cm value To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message