Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:32:24 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports Message-ID: <407D1338.5090800@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040414042233.GA12776@gurney.reilly.home> References: <p0602040cbca10a7dbe52@[128.113.24.47]> <20040414042233.GA12776@gurney.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Reilly wrote: > an archiver. There are several archivers in the tree already > (pax, tar, cpio, (zip is in ports, too)). Why not just use > one of those? All of these have command line arguments to I think we don't want a binary format because of CVS can't work with it well. As kris says shar will be much better. But as I can see it's not easy to extract separate file from it. And extracting in STDOUT too. -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?407D1338.5090800>