Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:49:16 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "stable" ports? Message-ID: <9bbcef731003300149u1cf355a5l3b277a21f627661f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d1003300030q34d9a839l9d3e44ce24405d@mail.gmail.com> References: <hoqikd$o2h$1@dough.gmane.org> <20100329172753.GB39715@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <hoqrtp$u16$1@dough.gmane.org> <7d6fde3d1003300018gf395446g703cd287c6265a76@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d1003300026qa537f77j239931591b64e7e@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d1003300030q34d9a839l9d3e44ce24405d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 March 2010 09:30, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry -- one last thing to kick around before I get off this topic: > > If this is really slick and tinderbox / whatever tools is doing its > job and no PRs have been reported for X number of days on a given port > (would require tie-ins to GNATS, or whatever), perhaps it would be > nice if ports were automatically `promoted' from HEAD to STABLE? I > mean, why do something if a computer can do it for you, right :)? No, not really - what if the new port contains a version bump? I don't consider "stable" as in "builds and works" good enough, it really needs to be kept in a sane state with regards to version bumps, shared libs bumps, etc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef731003300149u1cf355a5l3b277a21f627661f>