From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 27 22:52:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA02926 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA02921 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tom@localhost) by misery.sdf.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA07619; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 23:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 23:07:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: "Kevin P. Neal" cc: Ken Hornstein , hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UID < 65535? In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960828040628.00685104@interpath.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > At 10:57 PM 8/27/96 -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >>Me: When has a BSD-style copyright not been enough to keep code on the net? > >> > >>Reece: The original CMU AFS code had a BSD-style copyright on it. Where > >> can it be found now? > >> > >>Me: Oh. Is that our pizza? > > > >The reason that you can't find AFS anymore is because when the AFS > >people left CMU to form Transarc, one of the conditions of them buying > >the rights to AFS was to remove AFS from CMU's FTP sites and the sites > >of other places on the net (I don't quite know how they got the other > >sites to get rid of the code, though). > > Exactly the situation he wants to avoid. How? Licences can't protect the software from the developer of the software :) The only way to stop your friend from taking his "new AFS" corporate after making it, is to kill him after he is done :) Tom