From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 31 00:22:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0928CA51 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amon@aelita.org) Received: from aelita.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:7a8:7003::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDC07E8 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ra.aabs (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aelita.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4V0GRor085619; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:16:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from amon@ra.aabs) Received: (from amon@localhost) by ra.aabs (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r4V0GQAf085618; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:16:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from amon) Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 02:16:26 +0200 From: Herve Boulouis To: David Christensen Subject: Re: Support of Dell M620 broadcom BCM57810 Message-ID: <20130531001626.GC24559@ra.aabs> References: <20130529131313.GA24559@ra.aabs> <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36DE66@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20130530093137.GB24559@ra.aabs> <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36E8C3@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36E8C3@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Herve Boulouis , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" , Gary Zambrano X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:22:56 -0000 Le 30/05/2013 23:48, David Christensen a écrit: > > I'll be glad to test but I'd like to know : > > > > - do you require testing on -head or -stable ? > > Tested with 9.1 and 10.0-Current. Open to patches on earlier kernels for > the brave. > > > - in your opinion in which shape is the current code ? I mean how far are we > > from something more or less ready to put > > in production ? > > It's not extensively tested across all NICs yet (BCM57711E in an HP blade > system, BCM57810 w/ 10GBase-T PHY, etc. ) so some hardware specific > combinations may not work, but otherwise it's in good shape. > Really just needs some wider test before committing to the kernel. I guess we are just waiting for the source to give it a run then :) Regards, -- Herve Boulouis