Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:32:55 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How to include new dirs in @INC Message-ID: <20070724173255.GB42493@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <94D0B4C06F1B6E62AF90AEED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <A28004F61E056F5279E996F7@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070724095718.GB68140@heechee.tobez.org> <1B50EA71ECD75693D12CE9D3@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070724142514.GA4315@heechee.tobez.org> <69DD0E3AC68E2AEC7C876B4C@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070724161616.GA42493@heechee.tobez.org> <94D0B4C06F1B6E62AF90AEED@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:03:48PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 18:16:16 +0200 Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> > wrote: > >Right. I assume that the port you are creating uses "normal" Makefile.PL > >for a part of the configuration process, while not being the main > >configuration mechanism (that is, the port does not define PERL_CONFIGURE > >in its skeleton). > Yes, but it also uses GNU_CONFIGURE for the main parts of the port. > Is it possible to use both GNU_CONFIGURE *and* PERL_CONFIGURE? Nope, not to my knowledge. > I'll poke around. > Maybe I could pre-build the perl parts? This is a very complex port. Well, it certainly sounds like it is. There are other ports that do something similar, however, for example net/spread. In fact, what it does looks almost exactly like what you need. \Anton. -- We're going for 'working' here. 'clean' is for people with skills... -- Flemming Jacobsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070724173255.GB42493>