From owner-freebsd-commit Thu Mar 30 15:31:03 1995 Return-Path: commit-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA02066 for commit-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:31:03 -0800 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA02053 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:31:02 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA02045; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:31:00 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id PAA15095; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:30:42 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199503302330.PAA15095@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.i386 rc.i386 To: Harlan.Stenn@landmark.com (Harlan Stenn) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:30:42 -0800 (PST) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, ache@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-etc@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <26684.796602125@ren.landmark.com> from "Harlan Stenn" at Mar 30, 95 05:22:05 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 423 Sender: commit-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Is there some reason not to follow the SysV lead, and go for the > Start/Kill mechanism using [SK][0-9][0-9].name ? Personally, I'd prefer > 3 digits instead of 2, but that's just a nit. Yes, some people are alergetic to this scheme. :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'