From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 07:19:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D8616A4DA for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tenebras.com (dnscache.tenebras.com [66.92.188.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0181343FCB for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:19:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 69560 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 14:19:01 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 14:19:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3F9691D5.4080703@tenebras.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:19:01 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: security@freebsd.org References: <20031022032740.GA2605@dub.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20031021233604.0807f8a0@209.112.4.2> <3F9676FB.9020107@centtech.com> <3F968E85.1030902@tenebras.com> <20031022140919.GA61094@dub.net> In-Reply-To: <20031022140919.GA61094@dub.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hardware crypto and SSL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:19:03 -0000 Bill Swingle wrote: > When you say that they help quite a bit, do you mean for http+SSL or > some other application? It depends on the traffic profile -- it significantly reduces the overhead of session establishment, because that's where pubkey calculations occur. > What I'm getting at is this: can anyone actually confirm that using > hardware crypto can increase http+SSL speeds? I've yet to find any > mention of it on the web. For a first estimate, look at the claims of the manufacturers ;-) (nCipher, Hifn, etc.)