From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun May 12 10:24:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA01512 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 12 May 1996 10:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA01507 for ; Sun, 12 May 1996 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onyx.nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA22228; Sun, 12 May 1996 10:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 10:23:51 -0700 (PDT) From: invalid opcode To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List of open Problem Reports In-Reply-To: <22413.831896295@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 12 May 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I think all of the send-pr's that are -current specific, should be > > removed, as by the very nature of -current, these are things most likely > > being worked on or being fixed. > > Where would you have us track this information then? > Jordan Well things that were recently broken by current changes should probably be tracked in freebsd-current, but things that were already broken should be tracked by send-pr's. That's just my opinion. == Chris Layne ======================================== Nervosa Computing == == coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==