Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 10:05:27 +0000 From: Michael Joyner <mjoyner@vbservices.net> To: n0g0013 <ttz@cobbled.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow Message-ID: <40E927E7.1070507@vbservices.net> In-Reply-To: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86EBB@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <40E59559.8090907@cronyx.ru> <p06002035bd0b4bebb128@[10.0.1.3]> <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Enigmail" does inline PGP mime just fine. n0g0013 wrote: | On 02.07-19:31, Brad Knowles wrote: | [ ... ] | |> Yup. PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't |>ever get stolen or compromised. That makes it much harder for |>someone to successfully impersonate you. | | | what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i | investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant | to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). | | does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt | won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently | won't verify the content). | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA6SfnOElk0ppmOXwRAsAIAKCH9e5zBq0KpI5yxLgqHlQZIkpASwCgpgxP 0mE++TnHM50Eeezjc0KI13o= =gV+u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40E927E7.1070507>