From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 14:28:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E02106564A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D738FC0A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA15568; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:14:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4D8368C6.6090600@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:14:30 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110309 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacky Cao References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:13:52 +0000 Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 performance degrade under nforce310 computer X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:28:36 -0000 on 18/03/2011 14:37 Jacky Cao said the following: > > Any suggestion? I thought 64bit x86 should be more faster than i386. This statement is not necessarily true. No advise on your specific hardware though, sorry. -- Andriy Gapon