Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:11:37 +0100 From: "Greg Hennessy" <Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net> To: <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Pf in 4.11 Message-ID: <20050512201137.8B79B28@gw2.local.net> In-Reply-To: <4283A2F9.4060305@xecu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As for the queuing method, i've read that cbq is a more > refined/reliable than hfsc right now. Cant say I've had reliability problems with HFSC. It does require the sacrifice of several barnyard fowl to configure correctly, but I digress. > Anyway, why would ACK > prioritization be necessary on the pf/altq setup vs the > ipfw/dummynet setup? Never having had the pleasure of using dummynet/ipfw I couldn't possibly comment. But I would always recommend configuring some form of ACKPRI on a congested link. Backoff will kill tcp traffic otherwise. Greg > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050512201137.8B79B28>