From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:36:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FFA16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0shady0recs0@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC5513C468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0shady0recs0@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so4985anc for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:36:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kiSPUDbLox3fTqQnlU63F1/SGRn8fjiyav/wkuIOd3JaNsQ/toW2yVyvvBqmMC2dU6CA7qVdqzdnSV+ivu9mLtR4Ro7jdW/Qy3m8gNpR91SbuZyVvb3txH3jq7T93KGh2UrOHH2fnu/079EqL9aSedCfaDorP/dTpCSG+oX+QFQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kuTORuaSWP04L86gMw75mUW7Wqa5UXCEFNI0Lfeb3zl7HgpsFCPtylI+gMfyrUra8tPC9MvKsVbXJoPWNyVOm3g6Vx0opqtDfAkQOExY6RLZrRrITqMrwlU4L0TDiaaC1gA+/AQuXzu2abIp0NOCCdUQuxwhnZo1KNms5hgIAZc= Received: by 10.100.250.7 with SMTP id x7mr14709anh.1181691403281; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.91.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <937e203f0706121636q35b53d30x408b6caa080ecff6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:36:43 +0200 From: "Lubomir Georgiev" <0shady0recs0@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:36:44 -0000 OK, so that answers my question.... I'm just stupid :D Just one question - you're saying that it is possible to shape /delay, drop etc./ the packets so quickly so that when a pipe is fully utilized someone hits a queue with a higher weight /for example port 80 would be prioritized over p2p traffic/ it would be like as if the pipe was not used at all? -- mEsS wItH tHe bEsT dIE liKe tHe rESt