From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 16 18:37: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F1914FEB for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 18:36:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id DAA20142; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:36:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KVA size changes in 3.1-stable References: <199903162238.RAA14610@cs.rpi.edu> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 17 Mar 1999 03:36:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: "David E. Cross"'s message of "Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:38:27 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David E. Cross" writes: > However there are also > changes to the kernel's load address (0xf0100000 -> 0xe0100000). Are these > changes mandatory as well? This is part of what's needed to increase the kernel address space, which is necessary to support configurations with large amounts of RAM and/or large vvalues of maxusers. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message