From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 09:14:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A00316A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:14:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C18643D1D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Jun 2005 09:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) [129.187.19.157] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 02 Jun 2005 11:14:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E2E6C61D; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:15:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:15:31 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Matt Mills Message-ID: <20050602091531.GN63323@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <429EC5C1.2050201@btopenworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6eUvXotnMb6+obQB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <429EC5C1.2050201@btopenworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Outstanding PR for new port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:14:35 -0000 --6eUvXotnMb6+obQB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matt Mills wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I submitted a PR for a very simple new port=20 > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D79195) on 24th March. I've= =20 > not heard anything from anybody and the PR is still wide open. >=20 > I realise that everybody is a volunteer and doing stuff in their own=20 > time, so I can hardly complain. Just curious if there is anything=20 > further I can do to get this port committed sooner (it is preventing me= =20 > from updating another port which I maintain). >=20 > I guess I'm just a little surprised that such a simple little port=20 > hasn't been committed by someone by now. This isn't a rant and I'm not=20 > trying to upset anybody! :) Done. --6eUvXotnMb6+obQB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCns4zCkn+/eutqCoRArUKAJ9uFNXeuIOtGSIEwo6b47hoNcvcDQCg7RiC ayZZw5NPZquHTohvvLfrXEc= =uQYK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6eUvXotnMb6+obQB--