From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jul 30 1:39:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mrelay.jrc.it (mrelay.jrc.it [139.191.1.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3944914CC7 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 01:39:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick.hibma@jrc.it) Received: from elect8 (elect8.jrc.it [139.191.71.152]) by mrelay.jrc.it (LMC5692) with SMTP id KAA05824; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 10:38:29 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 10:38:27 +0200 (MET DST) From: Nick Hibma X-Sender: n_hibma@elect8 Reply-To: Nick Hibma To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Marc Schneiders , Malte Wedel , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: best time for cvsup? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Most active committers are in the States if you look at the frequency of commit messages. The European morning is the safest I guess. Nick On 30 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Marc Schneiders" writes: > > > Are there any experiences at what time (UTC) the -current tree is most > > stable? > > I've had no problems so far some time after 0:00 h GMT, using the Dutch > > mirror. I suppose you use the German one. Perhaps that is updated more > > often. > > Considering that the FreeBSD developers are scattered around the > globe, there's no "safe" time. And there's no guarantee that a bug > introduced one day won't be there the next day, either. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > -- ISIS/STA, T.P.270, Joint Research Centre, 21020 Ispra, Italy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message