From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 4 15:50:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8887915474; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11514; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:48:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lynx-current port is broken. In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Aug 1999 14:50:52 PDT." <199908042150.OAA02164@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 15:48:45 -0700 Message-ID: <11511.933806925@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes, unfortunately I am not the person to ask. :) The docproj port is Nik's baby and he could far better answer just why he used lynx-current rather than lynx. - Jordan > * From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > > * The port is broken, trust me. Please fix it since I've disabled all > * doc distributions in releases until this happens. > > Did you get this mail? > > Satoshi > ------- > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:36:32 -0700 (PDT) > To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com > CC: ports@freebsd.org, ache@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: lynx-current port is broken. > From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) > > * From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > > * Unfortunately, lynx-current is depended on by textproc/docproj and that > * in turn is depended on by the default make release rule. :) > > Why is docproj using lynx-current and not lynx? The whole point of > splitting lynx and lynx-current was to make the release *not* depend > on an unreliable port. > > -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message