From owner-freebsd-java Mon Oct 9 6:48: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from 4eva.net (4eVa.NET [211.60.20.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74C137B503 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 06:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (masterpc@localhost) by 4eva.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e99DlwV99457 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 22:47:59 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from masterpc@4eva.net) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 22:47:58 +0900 (KST) From: Kwi-Hyun Choi To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: JDK 1.2.2 for FreeBSD Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, >> Ernst de Haan wrote: >> ppl say that they use the linu-jdk1.2.2 port because the native FreeBSD >> JDK is not available as a port yet, and that makes me sad ;-( Why ppl use linux-jdk1.2.2 port ? I compiled jdk1.2.2 for FreeBSD successfully, although that is not safety. (by http://java.freebsd.org) [masterpc@4eva][~]$ java -version java version "1.2.2" Classic VM (build jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD:root:2000/10/06-17:58, green threads, nojit) Then, I have a question. Is there any problem if jdk1.2.2-FreeBSD is available as a port ? I think that it's better way to make jdk1.2.2 as a port although it's not safety. Is that wrong ? I wanna know that what the problem is. -.-a Justin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message