From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 11:32:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2898C106566C for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D0F8FC19 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LPEqU-00005v-Qo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:32:38 +0000 Received: from 213.27.232.70 ([213.27.232.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:32:38 +0000 Received: from matiassurdi by 213.27.232.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:32:38 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matias Surdi Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:32:31 +0100 Lines: 53 Message-ID: <4975B64F.20207@gmail.com> References: <4975B4E5.7000609@isafeelin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.27.232.70 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <4975B4E5.7000609@isafeelin.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: Large raid arrays X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:32:39 -0000 Frederique Rijsdijk escribió: > Matias Surdi wrote: >> Matias Surdi escribió: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've a host with two large (2Tb and 4 Tb) hardware raid5 arrays. >>> >>> For the backup system we are using, I need to join them to make 1 >>> logical device. >>> >>> What would you recomment? ccd or vinum? >>> >>> >> Some comments that may help in the decision: >> >> - Reliability/resistance to power failures are the most important factor. >> >> - It doesn't require high performance or high speed. >> > > Either gconcat or ZFS, depending which version of FreeBSD you're running. > > gconcat label -v data /dev/raid1 /dev/raid2 > newfs /dev/concat/data > mkdir /mnt/data && mount /dev/concat/data /mnt/data > df -h /mnt/data > > or > > zpool create data /dev/raid1 /dev/raid2 > df -h /data > > > > -- Frederique > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ZFS was a disaster. That is what we were using until today, when the power went off and the zfs pool ended up corrupted and irrecoverable. Three other times we had power failures, the zpool ended with some errors. But, all the times, the UFS partitions remained intact. I won't use ZFS for a long time.