Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:07:03 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: size of long on all supported arches Message-ID: <SI2PR01MB503670C7FA0998AD5EFF3737FA0D2@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7U%2BfGq%2BoU0nKTGNd68gav38CoA5z1z9rWmm%2BTLAQjiYp4Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFDf7UKA_fZC=WO3-8VTiGUBvSnrZagNb9mwEcNAc-6Gnwa3zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFDf7U%2BfGq%2BoU0nKTGNd68gav38CoA5z1z9rWmm%2BTLAQjiYp4Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. Nuno Teixeira wrote on 2024/04/19 17:11: > (...) > > If anyone wants to test, I've included patch in commit: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=89e4a1f2c1d1997b8414e2e648c7b4b7c829b63e I don't know how to write the language R, but it seems to me that it matches 1.0e-6 even when the size of long is 8. The size of long for 64-bit Windows is 4. For more details of it need to look into the history, which is more than 20 years old :) LP64 or LLP64 would be the key word for it. Regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SI2PR01MB503670C7FA0998AD5EFF3737FA0D2>