From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 23 14:13:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B71106564A for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from midgard.transactionware.com (mail2.transactionware.com [203.14.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7C7A8FC12 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25992 invoked by uid 907); 23 Feb 2012 13:46:51 -0000 Received: from eth222.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.54]) (150.101.196.221) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by midgard.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:46:51 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Jan Mikkelsen In-Reply-To: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:47:37 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A1E870C-9DD4-449C-8ECA-A5642FF71A7E@transactionware.com> References: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: O. Hartmann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:30:11 +0000 Cc: Current FreeBSD Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:13:34 -0000 Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really = looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an = editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not = even > for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is > written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE > was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated > version in the ports suited our needs. >=20 > Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I > filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. >=20 > I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use > CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried > devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of > configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and > not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. >=20 > devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since = many > of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, > but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. >=20 > Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, > I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the > focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, = CodeBlocks > is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. >=20 > Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm > also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity > to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an = IDE > is needed. >=20 > Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. >=20 > Oliver >=20