Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 16:29:41 +0930 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_BSD vs SCHED_ULE ... Message-ID: <20040601065941.GC74969@squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <20040529203815.G907@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040529203815.G907@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:41:53PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Is there a circumstance where the older SCHED is better then ULE? Or is the older one something that will eventually just be removed altogether? If the older does have areas in which it is the better, are there any docs comparing the two? An article was written here: "Scheduler Performance: ULE vs. 4BSD" http://www.thejemreport.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=116&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 - aW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040601065941.GC74969>