From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 00:23:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58885106566B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pedro@dehumanizer.com) Received: from kang.dehumanizer.com (kang.dehumanizer.com [206.125.172.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355FA8FC18 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kang.dehumanizer.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kang.dehumanizer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A234503C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:06:50 +0000 (WET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=dehumanizer.com; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=deh01; bh=gNZMaYbZ9tNUwVocNfNURaEe2+o=; b=g8SGOuG5roaYdHboJtfoakPt3JT8 +vVroNquWaEFRzA1s7aRJ08XbUjZBwQgeTU84xWOd5Q/kk4cVhnx8diPRz0bylnZ HaT6UFha6zquPMHRuG2ZSbj5G9TjZ8wJmFN8W3oAcqHb8rxqP2Rq1NApATxU/Ley jkGExfZfhif7KIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=dehumanizer.com; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= deh01; b=PO26hru1ktrAZRSQuM+A1W1Z93c5f+/AGWgbVpm3Vkb2POmpGVu7E3C tmfl+dWQXbbCkXj8v9xAB2k+7qkQhFm4UOShw1O5mQIqd7LrQNMvFSL6OwZAPNmZ 0cahsTQoXeX+SCe0kqb2JvSlpYaMVcR339q01O7cDls2cw33lNBc= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (a79-169-228-105.cpe.netcabo.pt [79.169.228.105]) by kang.dehumanizer.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9AB84501E for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:06:49 +0000 (WET) Message-ID: <4D49F197.5080304@dehumanizer.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:06:47 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGVkcm8gVGltw7N0ZW8=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110202-1, 02-02-2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:23:01 -0000 On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote: > What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and > configure. Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to configure, with great defaults and human-readable config files, and "powerful means hard to configure".