Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:12:08 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> Cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Unify printing the function name in panic messages() Message-ID: <511426B8.2070800@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51141E33.4080103@gmx.de> References: <51141E33.4080103@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 07/02/2013 23:35 Christoph Mallon said the following:
> panic("just a message");
This seems perfect.
Panic without at least a stack trace or preferably a crash dump is practically
useless in most cases. A stack trace already has all the function names.
So a function name in a message seems to be redundant.
JIMHO.
--
Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?511426B8.2070800>