From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 22:16:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8989E7 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elf.torek.net (50-73-42-1-utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.73.42.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0FB81DCE for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elf.torek.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elf.torek.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3LMFstd045652 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:15:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from torek@torek.net) Message-Id: <201404212215.s3LMFstd045652@elf.torek.net> From: Chris Torek To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: MAXPHYS in md(4) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:15:54 -0600 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (elf.torek.net [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:15:54 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:16:02 -0000 In svn commit: r264504 - head/sys/geom/uzip we have: Make sure not to do I/O for more than MAXPHYS bytes. Doing so can cause problems in our providers, such as a KASSERT in md(4). ... That would be this one: KASSERT(bp->bio_length <= MAXPHYS, ("bio_length %jd", (uintmax_t)bp->bio_length)); if ((bp->bio_flags & BIO_UNMAPPED) == 0) { pb = NULL; aiov.iov_base = bp->bio_data; } else { pb = getpbuf(&md_vnode_pbuf_freecnt); ... As it happens, the KASSERT is really only required for the pb != NULL case, which uses one of the reserved getpbuf() buffers that only map MAXPHYS bytes at a time. If bp->bio_flags says that the bio is mapped, we just use the existing KVA, and VOP_READ() and VOP_WRITE() must already break up arbitrarily large transfers. So, it seems like the md(4) KASSERT can be moved into the "else". Is this a good idea? (It might not help r264504 much since it looks like r264504 wants to handle short-read results anyway, but it seems overly restrictive to require <= MAXPHYS for the mapped cases.) Chris