From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 24 11:25:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583B01065679; Sun, 24 May 2009 11:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCB88FC14; Sun, 24 May 2009 11:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.local (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n4OBOxbi097377; Sun, 24 May 2009 05:25:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4A192E8B.2030204@samsco.org> Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:24:59 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd References: <4A18CA0D.6050805@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, freebsd-current Subject: Re: Default Xen PVM console? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:25:03 -0000 Adrian Chadd wrote: > 2009/5/24 Scott Long : > >> Treat xen as a new platform and have a src/etc/etc.xen directory that holds >> the xen-specific ttys files, along with similar things that it'll >> likely need. > > In -theory- there could be Xen PVM support for i386, amd64 and ia64; > with apparently some random work being done on ARM support in the > future. Once you start shifting away from full HVM mode, the instruction set architecture starts becoming much less relevant. Anything using the xc driver is going to behave pretty much the same in respect to the ttys file, regardless of if it's i386 or amd64 or arm. Scott