Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:59:50 +0100
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>
Cc:        kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org
Subject:   Re: [kde-freebsd] X related scripts in Xclients ports
Message-ID:  <1100534390.4198d276e82a8@netchild.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <200411151500.31461.andy@athame.co.uk>
References:  <200411151151.33028.freebsd@redesjm.local> <200411151357.33691.lauri@kde.org> <200411151500.31461.andy@athame.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Zitat von Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>:

> I'm in complete agreement with Lauri on this one. I fail to see where
> the improvement is, and if anything it makes things worse because of
> POLA.
>
> For me, I don't want to see such a change.

You're talking about policy, Jose talks about features.

>From a feature point of view: you don't have to use it. If you feel more
comfortable to use /etc/ttys, you're still free to use it (with or without
the work of Jose going officially into FreeBSD).

I see an improvement here: we're starting most programs/services from
(LOCALBASE)/etc/rc.d/, why should we make an exception for [xkg]dm?
Exceptions are not good for new users.

It's also more easy to start and stop with a rc.d script than with
/etc/ttys (less characters to type). You may not need to start/stop
it often, but when you have to, it's IMO more comfortable.

Bye,
Alexander.

BTW.: Before I switched to gdm, I've used a start-script for xdm since
a long time... maybe 3 or 4 years.
-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net/     Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org/        netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1100534390.4198d276e82a8>