From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 18:53:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C3D37B404 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B235D43F75 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:53:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from derwood@naebunny.net) Received: from adsl-64-108-107-194.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net (HELO derwood2) (sir?slig@sbcglobal.net@64.108.107.194 with login) by smtp-sbc-v1.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 01:53:51 -0000 From: "derwood" To: Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: <002a01c36074$95dd3180$6d00a8c0@derwood2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <20030811231014.GA55200@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: smp in 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 01:53:52 -0000 I've been running 5.1-Current since its release on a Dell Precision 410 with dual P-III 500's No SMP problems here at all.. Its been extremely stable for me thus far. Darin - -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steve Kargl Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM To: Andy Farkas Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Eriq Lamar Subject: Re: smp in 5.1 On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote: > > > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so > > could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual > > system using mp's but not sure which version would be better. > > Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*). > > Stick with 4.8. > > * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. > Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine. > Strange. ULE has worked fine on my UP system for several months and the SMP system I recently obtained from a co-worker hasn't panicked while running ULE. Can you drop into ddb and trace the problem with ULE on your system? -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"