Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 May 1996 21:28:15 +0300 (EET DST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: EDO & Memory latency
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960516212452.25743G-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <199605161709.KAA17364@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 16 May 1996, Terry Lambert wrote:

> > I have just tried lmbench and the numbers it gives are looking
> > slightly strange for me. It shows memory latency upto 500ns while
> > I have 60-ns EDO memory in a Pentium/75 box. Okay, its external
> > clock is 25MHz, this gives 40ns, one wait state, it gives another 40ns,
> > it gives 80ns, but why the overhead is over 400ns ? 
> 
> 25 * 3 = 75
> 
> Multiply access latency by 3.

Contrary to what some prefer to think, Pentium 75 run on the external
speed of 50 Mhz - 1.5*50=75. So how about looking the figures over once 
more time?

> 
> Then multiply the whole deal by 100/60 because you probably didn't
> set HZ to 100.
> 
> 
> 					Terry Lambert
> 					terry@lambert.org
> ---
> Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
> or previous employers.
> 

	Sander

.sigless on the moment




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960516212452.25743G-100000>