Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 20:19:37 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Message-ID: <v04011700b39728f63b38@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <19990623163928.E581@freebie.lemis.com> References: <199906230652.XAA00630@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 11:52:25PM -0700 <19990623084919.R76907@freebie.lemis.com> <199906230652.XAA00630@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 4:39 PM +0930 6/23/99, Greg Lehey wrote: >On Tuesday, 22 June 1999 at 23:52:25 -0700, Mike Smith wrote: >> [someone said] >>| [someone said] >>|> Ok, so let's follow Microsoft's industry-leading documentation >>|> standards. >>| >>| He said "commercial", not "toy". >> >> Given that I've just spent a very unhappy couple of weeks >> demonstrating that this "toy" you're referring to outperforms >> us by a factor of anything from 3 to 10 on a range of basic >> benchmarks, > > Really? This is so different from anything I've heard that I'm > astounded. How about some details? I also found Mike's comment on performance interesting. I assume he's talking about system performance, and not documentation performance. Was this when testing WinNT-2000, or just the latest service pack on WinNT 4? --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04011700b39728f63b38>