From owner-freebsd-net  Mon May 21 11: 2: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE1637B422
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 21 May 2001 11:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA08653;
	Mon, 21 May 2001 14:01:54 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 14:01:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200105211801.OAA08653@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Using connect() on UDP RPC client sockets. 
In-Reply-To: <200105211856.aa41143@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <20010521172419.A672@crow.dom2ip.de>
	<200105211856.aa41143@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Mon, 21 May 2001 18:56:02 +0100, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> said:

> I think the option should be renamed to something like IP_SENDSRCADDR
> just to avoid confusion - does this seem reasonable?

I think it's OK to add an additional name for the same control
message, but it should be possible (and documented) to use the exact
control message as was returned from recvmsg() as argument to
sendmsg().

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message