From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 27 11:08:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA13445
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA13438
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:08:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA12980; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:07:50 -0800 (PST)
To: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" <ugen@latte.worldbank.org>
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IP filtering strawman, comments please. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 1996 09:44:37."
             <Chameleon.825432906.ugen@ugen-tr> 
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 11:07:50 -0800
Message-ID: <12977.825448070@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>   - Masquareda certain connections for another IP's /ports/whatever.

If this feature alone were the only fall-out of a firewall redesign
project, there would be many hats in the air, I can assure you.  I
have a good friend in SF myself who's finances only allow the purchase
of one IP address, but he has 5 machines on his home ethernet.  I've
often wished I could tell him that FreeBSD had a solution to his
problem (and no, I'm too busy to get involved, thanks - you want to
see the new installation in *this* century, yes? :-)

					Jordan