From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 22 13:03:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781C5C1BFC2 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294FAC36 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u9MCeUnv043621 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:40:30 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:40:30 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:03:45 -0000 On 22/10/2016 11:31, Alphons van Werven wrote: > andrew clarke wrote: > >> Is this the first time a port has been deleted for being "offensive"? > There used to be "offensive" (a term to be taken rather loosely in this > case) fortune cookies, but they got kicked out somewhere in 9.X. That was > the base system though; not the ports tree. > > Come to think of it, I'm quite (be it pleasantly) surprised to see that > deskutils/hot-babe is still allowed. I'm still half waiting for someone > with misguided delusions of moral superiority to delete that port, thinking > it's their decision to make that FreeBSD must not enable people to display > their system load as a cartoon woman in various stages of undress. Or > something along those lines. But I digress... > > Anyway, if anyone misses this port, I'll be happy to maintain it privately > and make it available from a public repository, if only because I strongly > oppose censorship, so I would gladly help circumvent what I consider to be > a hopelessly outdated and even morally wrong concept. > > Fonz > Could you maybe have a separate category in ports, called "uncensored" or something? We are all adults and can take care of ourselves, can't we? Grzegorz