Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 21:14:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254072] textproc/ibus: update to 1.5.24 Message-ID: <bug-254072-7788-SFUiCmIJ7k@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-254072-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-254072-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254072 Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |rhurlin@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Henry Hu from comment #3) Hi Henry, I am aware that you are not the maintainer of those depend ports. The submitter (and the committer) of a patch should check all consumer port= s to see if they can actually build against the updated port. This should also be done with ports whose dependency is optional and disabled by default. Committers are always happy if the submitter does this himself, since committers usually have to test many different ports and dependencies in the same time ;) In this case with the textproc/ibus dependencies, you are probably right. S= ince the library major version remains, there are probably no incompatibilities = and then no bump of the dependent ports would be necessary. (Hint: Some test bu= ilds could check this ;) ) But we should be vigilant and if a problem does occur, we should be able to react together quickly. Is that ok for you? I will have a deeper look at the patch tomorrow. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-254072-7788-SFUiCmIJ7k>