From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Feb  7 22:30: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695A037B67D
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  7 Feb 2001 22:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id PAA13782;
	Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:29:44 +0900 (JST)
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: archie's message of Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:24:05 PST.
      <200102080524.VAA54629@curve.dellroad.org>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: [itojun@iijlab.net: accept(2) behavior with tcp RST right after handshake]
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 15:29:44 +0900
Message-ID: <13780.981613784@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>> Jayanth did make one point that an application could assume that 
>> the error return from accept was in regards to the listening socket
>> instead of the new socket, so that may be a concern.
>Yes I have always assumed this to be true. If the connection is
>already broken before I get it, why bother giving it to me??

	can we cancel sorwakeup() (happens on handshake completion)?
	I believed not.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message