From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May 15 11:49:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA07027
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [204.178.32.161])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07021
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA15186; Thu, 15 May 1997 14:58:50 GMT
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 14:58:49 +0000 (GMT)
From: spork <spork@super-g.com>
X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 
In-Reply-To: <17811.863652120@time.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970515145609.15144A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan et al,

So am I just lucky then or what?  I have been using procmail as a delivery
agent over NFS for quite some time now (2.1.6-7.1) with no problems
whatsoever...  Are you speaking of non-procmail usage of NFS mail spools,
or am I very, very lucky?

Charles
(who doesn't even know what dtmail is)

On Wed, 14 May 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> Anyone who accesses a mailbox via NFS is living on the ragged
> edge anyway. ;-)
> 
> 					Jordan
>